Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#1125 closed enhancement
obtain DOI for rasdaman code — at Version 7
| Reported by: | Peter Baumann | Owned by: | Peter Baumann |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | Future |
| Component: | wiki | Version: | development |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Complexity: | Easy |
Description (last modified by )
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | → 9.3 |
|---|
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | 9.3 → 9.4 |
|---|
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
I came across this: https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/ where https://zenodo.org/ is used for the DOI issuing. Seems to be free platform (result of an EU project), and works by uploading the code to it as far as I understood.
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
exactly, but uploading the code is not what we want - it would lead to a duplication with all the mess of inconsistencies. We need a DOI pointing at rasdaman.org, and that seems to be only available by paying continuously.
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | wontfix |
| Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
just learnt that a simple copy of a release to Zenodo is good enough to provide us with a DOI.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
after some search the only option I can find is going to mEDRA, and they take an annual fee for DOIs:
http://www.medra.org/en/terms.htm
As we cannot ensure permanent financial support for this I propose to not pursue this further.